_____________
__________________COMMENTARY _
CHICAGO 
SUN-TIMES
FRIDAY
JULY 18,
____2003___
 

PAGE 35

Stressed Americans ripe for GOP con

ANDREW GREELEY
 
 
 
 
 
 

Republicans are the party of 
      the rich, so it seems appro-
      priate that when they are in 
power they take care of the rich. 
The irony is that not all Republi-
cans are rich. So the Republican 
spin merchants must explain their 
economic decisions in terms that 
their ''base''--religious fundamen-
talists, poor white Southerners, 
alienated workers, hyper-patri-
ots--can accept. Heaven forfend--
you should excuse the expres-
sion--that the base might 
understand that money is being 
taken from them and turned over 
to the oil billionaires. Even the 
''base,'' dimwitted that it is, might 
not like the reverse Robin Hood 
tactics of the administration: Take 
from the poor and give to the rich.
    Hence, Republicans must por-
tray the various tax cuts as bene-
fits to all Americans, and explain 
that the most recent one will pro-
vide an economic incentive that
will create more jobs. You must 
not let the ''base'' know that two-
thirds of the money will go to the 
top 10 percent of the country, and 
that the top 1 percent will receive 
on the average $200,000 of pay-
backs. It is most unlikely that the 
rich and the super-rich will engage 
in the kind of consumption that 
would force business to increase its 
capital spending. More jobs might

appear if the money were spread 
around among the rest of the pop-
ulation. Soak the rich, as the late 
Huey P. Long of Louisiana once 
proclaimed, and spread it out thin.
    Similarly, the House version of 
the Medicare reform bill is admit-
tedly the first step in the long-
term goal of privatizing Medicare. 
However, it is presented in all seri-
ousness as a bill to decrease pre-
scription  costs  for  the  elderly. 
Thus, the GOP can go into the 
presidential campaign insisting 
that it has done something for the 
elderly, when in fact it hasn't done 
much, except increase profits for 
drug companies and insurance 
companies. Someone ought to ask 
senators   and   representatives 
whether they are willing to give up 
their own federal health insurance,
which is much more generous than 
Medicare, and join the rest of the
__________
How can they get away
with such sleight of
hand?

population in the risks of astro-
nomic prescription drug bills. 
    Finally, plans to eliminate over-
time pay are presented as a scheme 
to deprive union workers of their 
exorbitant wages (like $40 an hour 
if carpenters work on Sunday) and 
provide more jobs for non-union 
workers,  which  means---though 
they  don't  say  it---immigrant
workers who come cheaper than 
Americans.
    How can they get away with 
such sleight of hand? How can 
they deceive so many about their 
goals when the winners from such 
legislation or proposed legislation
will be the rich and the powerful? 
    How could they convince so 
many that the war in Iraq and the 
subsequent quagmire were justified 
by ''weapons of mass destruction'' 
when these weapons did not exist 
and the evidence that they did was 
largely cooked? On President Tru-
man's desk the sign said ''the buck 
stops here.'' On President Bush's 
desk the sign apparently says, ''the 
buck stops at the CIA.''
    The answer, I think, is that 
Americans are still so obsessed 
with the surprise and pain of the
World Trade Center attack that
they will believe just about any-
thing the country's leaders say. 
Hence,  they  can  stonewall  the 
commission   investigating   the 
World Trade Center attack and 
they can prevent a thorough inves-
tigation of the Iraq War. Ameri-
cans want to believe that the Bush 
administration is telling the truth.
    They are fooling most of the 
people most of the time. They 
hope to fool enough of the people <
long enough for re-election. And 
the media, which screamed in out-
rage when President Bill Clinton 
lied about his sex life, are not 
screaming about the fabrications 
of the Bush administration about 
taxes, Medicare, work hours, the 
attack on Sept. 11, and the Iraqi
war. Obviously, dishonesty about 
sex is a worse threat to the repub-
lic than dishonesty about war and 
taxes. 
    The administration obviously 
intends to tough it out, just like 
Nixon did. Maybe it will work. 
However, at the end of the eight 
years, the country will be in a terri-
ble economic mess, its civil liber-
ties in tatters, hated by the rest of 
the world---and  probably  still 
fighting a foolish war in Iraq.