WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2007
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES |

COMMENTARY  |  41


Nurture, don't squelch, independent media voices






DEBORAH DOUGLAS


ddouglas@suntimes.com
T       he guys who run our media,
      they're one bland bunch. If you
      look at the big six media com-
panies, they're all headed by males.
All but one is white. They are rich,
too. Because of their power over our
airwaves, these same guys are the
nation's conversation starters.
  How engaging can that dialogue
be when such a homogenous group
decides what we get to talk about?
  If more top executives were
women, minorities and regular Joes,
the national dialogue would be so
much richer. We shouldn't stop
there: Let's require those executives

The FCC may give
these guys more
power to monopolize
the conversation.

  to ask us what we want to watch and
make them follow through. Let's de-
mand more substantive, program-
ming to offset an empty TV diet of
Paris Hilton.
  Instead the Federal Communica-















tions Commission may give these
guys more power to monopolize the
conversation if it decides to further
deregulate media ownership. The
guys with fat wallets and stuffed
shirts could buy up more local me-
dia, even allowing newspapers to
easily merge with TV stations in the
same market. That would thrust the
country into a big, fat, one-way con-
fab dictated from headquarters. Lo-
cal issues that bubble forth with au-
thenticity in search of solutions
could be muzzled.
  Do you really want to live in a
place dominated by stuffy Tribune
types?
  "If we go in the wrong direction
and allow more consolidation, I'm
afraid we're going to invoke more se-
rious damage on our media
environment than we have right
now," said FCC commissioner
Michael Copps before a public hear-
ing at the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
Thursday. "We're going to get more















of that kind of nationalized, homo-
genized entertainment. I think we
endanger our civic dialogue."
  This has happened before. When
the Telecommunications Act of 1996
passed, the public was promised
more choice because of the in-
creased competition from deregula-
tion. What we got was less locally
owned media, as evidenced by the
rise of behemoth Clear Channel
Communications, and fewer local
broadcast jobs.
  Homogenized playlists dominate
radio, choking the ability of inde-
pendent artists to get radio play, or
for audiences to hear something
new and interesting. Our cable bills
did not go down.
  Anybody who's watched TV in the
past five minutes will know prime
time hardly looks like America. Save
for a few TV ghettos, strokes of cable
brilliance and ensemble casts, TV
doesn't reflect the diversity of real
life. It certainly doesn't mirror the















ethnic, racial and socioeconomic
mix that is Chicago.
  Sure, the Internet has incubated
new voices, and interesting new mu-
sic can be found. Those voices could
be controlled, too.
  "Guess who's buying all the major
[Internet] outlets?" said Chicago
music promoter Carl West. "Guess
who bought MySpace? Big media.
Guess who bought YouTube? Those
companies who bought them are
trying to figure out how to monopo-
lize them. The same thing happened
with downloading."
  Diverse viewpoints is a public
safety issue, said rapper KRS-One:
"What difference does it make if you
own a station, black, white, whatever,
if your heart isn't in the right place?
Our culture is being criminalized by
radio stations. Police officers listen to
the radio as well, and if they keep
hearing 'Yo, I'm a criminal, I'm a
pimp, I'm a this,' when I walk down
the street, they're going to immedi-















ately think that's me. I beg the FCC
to help us."
  The FCC won't decide what to do
until they complete a series of pub-
lic meetings like the one at PUSH.
From little old white ladies and teen
girls to struggling broadcasters, the
consensus was clear: Don't let a
handful of rich guys monopolize the
airwaves. Restore localism. Inject a
moral imperative to reflect public
passions and concerns where the
profit motive now prevails.
  The FCC is not bereft of ideas for
boosting the ranks of media owner-
ship. It could, for example, help re-
institute a program that gives tax
savings to owners of broadcast li-
censes who sell their companies to
minority owners.
  I'm not saying these six guys
shouldn't keep their day jobs. But
the FCC should give a more diverse,
new group of people an opportunity
to start conversations. Tuning into
ownership is a good place to start.
Listen to the Public Hearing of 9/20 -> HERE <-