----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
    PAUL KRUGMAN    

Sacrifice
Is for
Suckers

    On this Fourth of July, President
Bush compared the Iraq war to the
Revolutionary War, and called for
“more patience, more courage and
more sacrifice.” Unfortunately, it
seems that nobody asked the obvious
question: “What sacrifices have you
and your friends made, Mr. Presi-
dent?”
    On second thought, there would be
no point in asking that question. In
Mr. Bush’s world, only the little peo-
ple make sacrifices.
    You see, the Iraq war, although
Mr. Bush insists that it’s part of a
Global War on Terror(), a fight to the
death between good and evil, isn’t
like America’s other great wars —
wars in which the wealthy shared the
financial burden through higher tax-
es and many members of the elite
fought for their country.
    This time around, Mr. Bush cele-
brated Mission Accomplished by cut-
ting tax rates on dividends and cap-
ital gains, while handing out huge no-
bid contracts to politically connected
corporations. And in the four years
since, as the insurgency Mr. Bush ini-
tially taunted with the cry of “Bring
lhem on” has claimed the lives -of
thousands of Americans and left
thousands more grievously wounded,
the children of the elite — especially
the Republican elite — have been
conspicuously absent from the bat-
tlefield.
    The Bushies, it seems, like starting
fights, but they don’t believe in pay-

__________ The Bushies are different from you and me. __________

ing any of the cost of those fights or bearing any of the risks. Above all, they don’t believe that they or their friends should face any personal or professional penalties for trivial sins like distorting intelligence to get America into an unnecessary war, or totally botching that war’s execution.   The Web site Think Progress has summary of what happened to the men behind the war after we didn't find W.M.D., and weren’t welcomed as liberators: “The architects of the war: Where are they now?” To read that summary is to be awed by the comprehensiveness and generosity of the neocon welfare system. Even Paul Wolfowltz, who managed the rare feat of messing up not one but two high-level jobs, has found refuge at the American Enterprise Insti- tute.   Which brings us to the case of I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby Jr.   The hysteria of the neocons over the prospect that Mr. Libby might actually do time for committing per- jury was a sight to behold. In an opin- ion piece in The Wall Street Journal titled “Fallen Soldier,” Fouad Ajami of. Johns Hopkins University cited the soldier’s creed: “I will never leave a fallen comrade.” He went on to declare that “Scooter Libby was a soldier in your — our — war in Iraq.”   Ah, yes. Shuffling papers in an air- conditioned Washington office is ex- actly like putting your life on the line in Anbar or baghdad. Spending 30 months in a minimum-security pris- on, with a comfortable think-tank job waiting at the other end, is exactly like having half your face or both your legs blown off by an I.E.D.   What lay behind the hysteria, of course, was the prospect that for the very first time one of the people who tricked America into war, then en- dangered national security yet again in the effort to cover their tracks, might pay some price. But Mr. Aja- ml needn’t have worried.   Back when the investigation into the leak-of Valerie Plame Wilson’s identity began, Mr. Bush insisted that if anyone in his administration had violated the law, ‘That person will be taken care of.” Now we know what he meant. Mr. Bush hasn’t chal- lenged the verdict in the Libby case, and other people convicted of similar offenses have spent substantial peri- ods of time in prison. But Mr. Libby goes free.   Oh, and don’t fret about the fact that Mr: Libby still had to ‘pay a fine. Does anyone doubt that his friends will find a way to pick up the tab?   Mr. Bush says that Mr. Libby’s punishment remains “harsh” be- cause his reputation is “forever dam- aged.” Meanwhile, Mr. Bush em- ploys, as a deputy national security adviser, none other than Elliott Abrams, who pleaded guilty to un- lawfully withholding information from Congress in the Iran-contra af- fair. Mr. Abrams was one of six Iran- contra defendants pardoned by Mr. Bush’s father, who was himself a subject of the special prosecutor’s in- vestigation of the scandal.   In other words, obstruction of jus- tice when it gets too close to home is a family tradition. And being a loyal Bushie means never having to say you’re sorry.